Inferring Sexual Interst from Behavioral Cues as a Function of 2D:4D Ratio and Sex

Faculty Mentor

Jillene Grover Seiver

Presentation Type

Poster

Start Date

5-8-2024 9:00 AM

End Date

5-8-2024 10:45 AM

Location

PUB NCR

Primary Discipline of Presentation

Psychology

Abstract

Research over the past 40 years has shown that male college students perceive more sexual intent in friendly female behavior than female college students do. This effect may be due to male socialization to view friendly women as sexually receptive or due to biological predispositions. The current study sought to determine whether the differences between males and females might be attributable to differences in prenatal exposure to testosterone. We predicted that people with a smaller 2D:4D ratio, a measure of prenatal testosterone exposure, would perceive greater sexual intent in friendly female scenarios.

Psychology students rated the sexual intent of female actors in scenarios describing friendly behaviors, and then we took digital photos of their outstretched hands, palms up. Afterward, the length of the index finger (2D) and the ring finger (4D) on each participant’s photographed hand was measured, and the 2D:4D ratio for each hand was calculated. The ratings of the sexual intent of female actors behaving in a friendly way (e.g., “She smiled at him”) were analyzed in a MANOVA. Males gave higher ratings of sexual intent than females did, and participants with smaller 2D:4D on their right hands gave higher ratings of sexual intent than participants with larger or equal 2D:4D ratios. These results support a biological basis for sex differences in interpretations of friendly female behavior.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 8th, 9:00 AM May 8th, 10:45 AM

Inferring Sexual Interst from Behavioral Cues as a Function of 2D:4D Ratio and Sex

PUB NCR

Research over the past 40 years has shown that male college students perceive more sexual intent in friendly female behavior than female college students do. This effect may be due to male socialization to view friendly women as sexually receptive or due to biological predispositions. The current study sought to determine whether the differences between males and females might be attributable to differences in prenatal exposure to testosterone. We predicted that people with a smaller 2D:4D ratio, a measure of prenatal testosterone exposure, would perceive greater sexual intent in friendly female scenarios.

Psychology students rated the sexual intent of female actors in scenarios describing friendly behaviors, and then we took digital photos of their outstretched hands, palms up. Afterward, the length of the index finger (2D) and the ring finger (4D) on each participant’s photographed hand was measured, and the 2D:4D ratio for each hand was calculated. The ratings of the sexual intent of female actors behaving in a friendly way (e.g., “She smiled at him”) were analyzed in a MANOVA. Males gave higher ratings of sexual intent than females did, and participants with smaller 2D:4D on their right hands gave higher ratings of sexual intent than participants with larger or equal 2D:4D ratios. These results support a biological basis for sex differences in interpretations of friendly female behavior.