EWU Digital Commons - 2024 Symposium: The Effects of Velocity Based Training Versus Percentage Based on Lower Body Power in Female Collegiate Athletes
 

The Effects of Velocity Based Training Versus Percentage Based on Lower Body Power in Female Collegiate Athletes

Faculty Mentor

Dr. Kristyne Wiegand

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Start Date

5-7-2024 11:10 AM

End Date

5-7-2024 11:30 AM

Location

PAT 348

Primary Discipline of Presentation

Wellness & Movement Sciences

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Velocity-based training (VBT) is an alternative and more individualized approach for determining resistance than percentage-based training (PBT) within a strength training program. However, VBT benefits in female collegiate athletes are not well-documented. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of VBT to PBT on strength and power in female collegiate athletes. METHODS: Sixteen female collegiate soccer and volleyball athletes were randomly assigned to an 8-week strength and power-focused PBT or VBT protocol. Before and after the training period, vertical jump (VJ), maximal back squat, and reactive strength index (RSI) were measured. A 2x2 factorial ANOVA (α=.05) was used to assess group and time differences in the variables of interest. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction for RSI (VBT: -16.3±4.4; PBT:2.9±24.5; p=0.33), but no significant main effects (p>.05). There was a significant main effect of time for VJ (VBT:16±.0.6; PBT:1.5±0.7) and squat (VBT:11.9±7.7; PBT:11.5±5.6; p.05). CONCLUSION: Both VBT and PBT effectively improved VJ and squat. As such, both methods can effectively improve strength, but VBT may limit speed-based development in measures such as RSI.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 7th, 11:10 AM May 7th, 11:30 AM

The Effects of Velocity Based Training Versus Percentage Based on Lower Body Power in Female Collegiate Athletes

PAT 348

INTRODUCTION: Velocity-based training (VBT) is an alternative and more individualized approach for determining resistance than percentage-based training (PBT) within a strength training program. However, VBT benefits in female collegiate athletes are not well-documented. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of VBT to PBT on strength and power in female collegiate athletes. METHODS: Sixteen female collegiate soccer and volleyball athletes were randomly assigned to an 8-week strength and power-focused PBT or VBT protocol. Before and after the training period, vertical jump (VJ), maximal back squat, and reactive strength index (RSI) were measured. A 2x2 factorial ANOVA (α=.05) was used to assess group and time differences in the variables of interest. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction for RSI (VBT: -16.3±4.4; PBT:2.9±24.5; p=0.33), but no significant main effects (p>.05). There was a significant main effect of time for VJ (VBT:16±.0.6; PBT:1.5±0.7) and squat (VBT:11.9±7.7; PBT:11.5±5.6; p.05). CONCLUSION: Both VBT and PBT effectively improved VJ and squat. As such, both methods can effectively improve strength, but VBT may limit speed-based development in measures such as RSI.