PROXIMAL EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL DYSFUNCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Faculty Mentor
Fahed Mehyar
Presentation Type
Poster
Start Date
4-14-2026 9:00 AM
End Date
4-14-2026 11:00 AM
Location
PUB NCR
Primary Discipline of Presentation
Physical Therapy
Abstract
Blood-flow-restriction training (BFR) is an exercise technique that involves partially occluding blood flow to distal muscles. This has been demonstrated to stimulate growth in distal musculature. There has also been research on the proximal effects of BFR training. However, there is a lack of clarity throughout the literature on the effect of BFR on proximal musculature. The objective of this literature review is to summarize and synthesize findings regarding the proximal effect of BFR in individuals with musculoskeletal dysfunction. A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane library, Health Source, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTdiscuss. Keywords included “BFR,” “blood flow restriction,” “occlusion training,” or “katsu training,” and “proximal effect.” Inclusion criteria were full-text experimental studies focusing on proximal musculoskeletal effects of BFR. Posters, editorials, and non-English publications were excluded. Six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Study populations included individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome (one study), low back pain (two studies), rotator cuff tendinopathy (one study), rounded shoulder posture (one study), and stress urinary incontinence (one study). Three studies showed a statistically significant increase in shoulder and trunk extensor strength compared to the control group, one showed no difference between groups, and one showed a statistically significant decrease compared to control. Current evidence does not consistently support superior proximal adaptations with BFR training compared with non-BFR exercise in individuals with musculoskeletal dysfunction. Additional research is needed to clarify the benefit given to proximal musculature from BFR training in patients with musculoskeletal dysfunction
Recommended Citation
Ness, Emily and Witzel, Allison, "PROXIMAL EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL DYSFUNCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW" (2026). 2026 Symposium. 5.
https://dc.ewu.edu/srcw_2026/ps_2026/p1_2026/5
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
PROXIMAL EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL DYSFUNCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
PUB NCR
Blood-flow-restriction training (BFR) is an exercise technique that involves partially occluding blood flow to distal muscles. This has been demonstrated to stimulate growth in distal musculature. There has also been research on the proximal effects of BFR training. However, there is a lack of clarity throughout the literature on the effect of BFR on proximal musculature. The objective of this literature review is to summarize and synthesize findings regarding the proximal effect of BFR in individuals with musculoskeletal dysfunction. A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane library, Health Source, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTdiscuss. Keywords included “BFR,” “blood flow restriction,” “occlusion training,” or “katsu training,” and “proximal effect.” Inclusion criteria were full-text experimental studies focusing on proximal musculoskeletal effects of BFR. Posters, editorials, and non-English publications were excluded. Six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Study populations included individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome (one study), low back pain (two studies), rotator cuff tendinopathy (one study), rounded shoulder posture (one study), and stress urinary incontinence (one study). Three studies showed a statistically significant increase in shoulder and trunk extensor strength compared to the control group, one showed no difference between groups, and one showed a statistically significant decrease compared to control. Current evidence does not consistently support superior proximal adaptations with BFR training compared with non-BFR exercise in individuals with musculoskeletal dysfunction. Additional research is needed to clarify the benefit given to proximal musculature from BFR training in patients with musculoskeletal dysfunction