Factors Affecting Instructional Practices in Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences

Faculty Mentor

Dr. Bo Idsardi

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Start Date

May 2025

End Date

May 2025

Location

PUB 317

Primary Discipline of Presentation

Biology

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences, also known as CUREs, integrate authentic scientific investigations into STEM curricula. These experiences prioritize scientific practices, discovery, real-world relevance, collaboration, and iterative experimentation. CUREs offer a more accessible approach to engaging diverse student populations compared to traditional labs. However, they can place heavy demands on instructors, with challenges like time limitations, scalability constraints, and resource availability. This research focuses on (1) the importance instructors place on implementing CURE characteristics and (2) the factors that influence their planning and implementation of CUREs. Instructor perspectives were analyzed using the Teacher-Centered Systematic Reform model in a multiple-case study conducted at a primarily undergraduate institution. Qualitative data from observations and interviews were inductively coded to identify challenges and gather detailed perspectives. Preliminary findings suggest that while instructors experience varied challenges when implementing CUREs, several common themes emerge. A primary concern is time availability, particularly the difficulty of revising lesson plans and keeping up with evolving evidence-based teaching practices. Furthermore, the lack of clear guidelines for designing and delivering these courses adds to the complexity of implementation. These findings will help identify opportunities to better support instructors in planning and implementing CUREs, ultimately enhancing both the teaching experience for instructors and the learning experience for students.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 7th, 1:00 PM May 7th, 1:20 PM

Factors Affecting Instructional Practices in Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences

PUB 317

Course-based undergraduate research experiences, also known as CUREs, integrate authentic scientific investigations into STEM curricula. These experiences prioritize scientific practices, discovery, real-world relevance, collaboration, and iterative experimentation. CUREs offer a more accessible approach to engaging diverse student populations compared to traditional labs. However, they can place heavy demands on instructors, with challenges like time limitations, scalability constraints, and resource availability. This research focuses on (1) the importance instructors place on implementing CURE characteristics and (2) the factors that influence their planning and implementation of CUREs. Instructor perspectives were analyzed using the Teacher-Centered Systematic Reform model in a multiple-case study conducted at a primarily undergraduate institution. Qualitative data from observations and interviews were inductively coded to identify challenges and gather detailed perspectives. Preliminary findings suggest that while instructors experience varied challenges when implementing CUREs, several common themes emerge. A primary concern is time availability, particularly the difficulty of revising lesson plans and keeping up with evolving evidence-based teaching practices. Furthermore, the lack of clear guidelines for designing and delivering these courses adds to the complexity of implementation. These findings will help identify opportunities to better support instructors in planning and implementing CUREs, ultimately enhancing both the teaching experience for instructors and the learning experience for students.